How can every affine scheme fit inside Z2 = 0?

Throughout, an affine scheme means a finitely presented affine scheme over a field kk. An affine-linear section is a scheme-theoretic intersection with a closed subscheme cut out by affine-linear equations. Write MNM_N for the affine space of N×NN\times N matrices.

The construction will replace the equations of XX by affine-linear conditions on a matrix ZZ satisfying Z2=0Z^2=0. A fixed identity block forces maximal square-zero rank, placing the matrices in one smooth nilpotent orbit over a field, while the affine-linear section cuts out XX itself.

The algebraic construction works over an arbitrary commutative ring RR; after constructing the section, we specialize to R=kR=k for the orbit and symplectic interpretation. For a,bRa,b\in R,

(0ab0)2=(ab00ab).\begin{pmatrix}0&a\\ b&0\end{pmatrix}^{\!2} = \begin{pmatrix}ab&0\\0&ab\end{pmatrix}.

Affine-linear maps put a,ba,b into the off-diagonal entries and read either diagonal entry after squaring. Thus one 2×22\times2 matrix square computes multiplication over every characteristic.

02−1.50 ² = −300−3

Both diagonal entries are ab.

Size two is necessary for a characteristic-independent construction. In characteristic two, every scalar expression built from affine maps and unary squaring is a sum of Frobenius powers and has no mixed monomial xyxy.

Write

X=SpecR[t1,,tn]/(f1,,fr)X=\operatorname{Spec}R[t_1,\ldots,t_n]/(f_1,\ldots,f_r)

and choose a straight-line circuit for the fif_i, using constants, addition, subtraction and multiplication. A straight-line circuit introduces each new wire once and only uses earlier wires.

For example, the cusp y2=x3y^2=x^3 may be written

u=x2,v=ux,w=y2,wv=0.u=x^2,\qquad v=ux,\qquad w=y^2,\qquad w-v=0.

Reserve one 1×11\times1 diagonal block of a matrix AA for every scalar wire. For every multiplication gate w=wiwjw_\ell=w_iw_j, reserve a private block

(0wiwj0).\begin{pmatrix}0&w_i\\w_j&0\end{pmatrix}.

Set every unused entry of AA to zero and introduce a second matrix BB. We will intersect the resulting affine-linear conditions with the graph B=A2B=A^2.

By the 2×22\times2 identity, a diagonal entry of the private block of BB is wiwjw_iw_j; identify that entry affinely with ww_\ell. Constants, copying, addition, subtraction and the final zero-output conditions are affine-linear. Together these conditions cut out an affine-linear closed subscheme LXMN×MNL_X\subset M_N\times M_N.

Size. If the circuit has ss scalar wires and mm multiplication gates, this construction uses N=s+2mN=s+2m.

If

ΓN={(A,B):B=A2},\Gamma_N=\{(A,B):B=A^2\},

then

XLXΓN.X\cong L_X\cap\Gamma_N.

The isomorphism is scheme-theoretic. After eliminating BB, the coordinate ring is the polynomial ring in the circuit wires modulo the gate and output equations. Every internal gate equation is monic in a fresh wire. Eliminating the wires in circuit order leaves exactly R[t1,,tn]/(f1,,fr)R[t_1,\ldots,t_n]/(f_1,\ldots,f_r), including its nilpotents, embedded components and multiplicities.

Now send the graph of squaring into one square-zero equation by the affine-linear map

ιN(A,B)=(AINBA).\iota_N(A,B)= \begin{pmatrix}A&I_N\\-B&-A\end{pmatrix}.

Put E=A2BE=A^2-B. Direct block multiplication gives

ιN(A,B)2=(E0ABBAE),ABBA=EAAE.\iota_N(A,B)^2 = \begin{pmatrix} E&0\\ AB-BA&E \end{pmatrix}, \qquad AB-BA=EA-AE.

The two diagonal blocks are EE, while the lower-left block belongs to the ideal generated by the entries of EE. Therefore the pullback of the ideal generated by the entries of Z2Z^2 is exactly the graph ideal generated by the entries of A2BA^2-B:

ιN1({ZM2N:Z2=0})=ΓN\iota_N^{-1}\!\left(\{Z\in M_{2N}:Z^2=0\}\right)=\Gamma_N

scheme-theoretically. Already this is an affine-linear section of the square-zero matrix scheme.

Let

𝒞N={(AINBA):A,BMN}.\mathcal C_N= \left\{ \begin{pmatrix}A&I_N\\-B&-A\end{pmatrix}:A,B\in M_N \right\}.

The fixed top-right block forces rank at least NN. A square-zero endomorphism of a 2N2N-dimensional vector space satisfies imZkerZ\operatorname{im}Z\subseteq\ker Z, hence has rank at most NN. Thus every field-valued point of 𝒞N\mathcal C_N with Z2=0Z^2=0 has maximal possible square-zero rank NN.

Let

JN=(0IN00),𝒪N=GL2NJN.J_N=\begin{pmatrix}0&I_N\\0&0\end{pmatrix}, \qquad \mathcal O_N=\operatorname{GL}_{2N}\!\cdot J_N.

The orbit 𝒪N\mathcal O_N has exactly the matrices with Z2=0Z^2=0 and rankZ=N\operatorname{rank}Z=N. Indeed, for such a matrix,

imZ=kerZ=:K,\operatorname{im}Z=\ker Z=:K,

and the induced map k2N/KKk^{2N}/K\to K is an isomorphism. Conversely, a subspace KGr(N,2N)K\in\operatorname{Gr}(N,2N) together with an isomorphism k2N/KKk^{2N}/K\to K determines such a matrix. Hence 𝒪N\mathcal O_N is the open isomorphism locus in the vector bundle

Hom(k2N/𝒮,𝒮)Gr(N,2N),\operatorname{Hom}(k^{2N}/\mathcal S,\mathcal S) \longrightarrow \operatorname{Gr}(N,2N),

so it is smooth and irreducible, with

dim𝒪N=N2+N2=2N2.\dim \mathcal O_N=N^2+N^2=2N^2.

The cell needed below is the orbit of JNJ_N under a simple abelian unipotent subgroup. For AMNA\in M_N, set

u(A)=(IN0AIN).u(A)=\begin{pmatrix}I_N&0\\-A&I_N\end{pmatrix}.

Then, over every kk-algebra,

u(A)JNu(A)1=(AINA2A).u(A)\,J_N\,u(A)^{-1} = \begin{pmatrix}A&I_N\\-A^2&-A\end{pmatrix}.

As AA varies, u(A)u(A) runs through an abelian unipotent subgroup isomorphic to 𝔾aN2\mathbb G_a^{N^2}. The conjugation identity identifies its orbit with

𝒰N={(AINA2A):AMN}𝔸kN2.\mathcal U_N= \left\{ \begin{pmatrix}A&I_N\\-A^2&-A\end{pmatrix}:A\in M_N \right\} \cong\mathbb A_k^{N^2}.

It is closed in 𝒪N\mathcal O_N: inside M2NM_{2N} it is the graph cut out by

Z12=IN,Z22=Z11,Z21=Z112.Z_{12}=I_N, \qquad Z_{22}=-Z_{11}, \qquad Z_{21}=-Z_{11}^2.

Combining the block-square and conjugation identities gives equalities of subschemes

𝒞N{Z2=0}=𝒞N𝒪N=𝒰N.\mathcal C_N\cap\{Z^2=0\} = \mathcal C_N\cap\mathcal O_N = \mathcal U_N.

These identities hold functorially on every kk-algebra, hence as equalities of subschemes.

For N=1 the matrix is

Z(a)= 0.81−0.64−0.8

The blue line is both kernel and image. It is the graph y=ax.

The same description holds for every NN:

kerZ(A)=imZ(A)={(x,Ax):xkN}=graph(A).\ker Z(A)=\operatorname{im}Z(A)=\{(x,-Ax):x\in k^N\}=\operatorname{graph}(-A).

Thus AkerZ(A)A\mapsto\ker Z(A) identifies 𝒰N\mathcal U_N with the standard affine big cell of Gr(N,2N)\operatorname{Gr}(N,2N).

The identity block forces maximal square-zero rank, placing the cell in 𝒪N\mathcal O_N. As AA varies, u(A)u(A) runs through an abelian unipotent subgroup whose orbit is 𝒰N\mathcal U_N. The trace pairing gives 𝒪N\mathcal O_N its natural symplectic form; 𝒰N\mathcal U_N is isotropic and half-dimensional, hence Lagrangian.

Why is the orbit symplectic and the cell Lagrangian?

The stabilizer of JNJ_N is

Stab(JN)={(PQ0P):PGLN,QMN},\operatorname{Stab}(J_N)= \left\{ \begin{pmatrix}P&Q\\0&P\end{pmatrix}: P\in\operatorname{GL}_N,\ Q\in M_N \right\},

which is smooth. Hence the orbit map is separable and

TZ𝒪N={[X,Z]:XM2N(k)}.T_Z\mathcal O_N=\{[X,Z]:X\in M_{2N}(k)\}.

The trace pairing X,Y=tr(XY)\langle X,Y\rangle=\operatorname{tr}(XY) on M2N(k)M_{2N}(k) is perfect over every field. Define

ωZ([X,Z],[Y,Z])=tr(Z[X,Y]).\omega_Z([X,Z],[Y,Z]) = \operatorname{tr}\!\bigl(Z[X,Y]\bigr).

For v=[X,Z]v=[X,Z], ωZ(v,v)=tr(Z[X,X])=0\omega_Z(v,v)=\operatorname{tr}(Z[X,X])=0, so ω\omega is alternating.

If [X,Z]=0[X,Z]=0, then

tr(Z[X,Y])=tr([Z,X]Y)=0,\operatorname{tr}\!\bigl(Z[X,Y]\bigr) =\operatorname{tr}\!\bigl([Z,X]Y\bigr)=0,

so the formula is independent of the chosen representative XX. By conjugation-invariance of trace, at JNJ_N this bilinear form is invariant under Stab(JN)\operatorname{Stab}(J_N), so it descends to a regular GL2N\operatorname{GL}_{2N}-invariant two-form on GL2N/Stab(JN)𝒪N\operatorname{GL}_{2N}/\operatorname{Stab}(J_N)\cong\mathcal O_N. If it pairs [X,Z][X,Z] to zero with every tangent vector, then

0=tr(Z[X,Y])=tr([Z,X]Y)for every Y,0=\operatorname{tr}\!\bigl(Z[X,Y]\bigr) =\operatorname{tr}\!\bigl([Z,X]Y\bigr) \quad\text{for every }Y,

so [Z,X]=0[Z,X]=0 and the tangent vector vanishes. Thus ω\omega is nondegenerate. Evaluating dωd\omega on the fundamental vector fields generated by X,Y,WX,Y,W gives

(dω)Z([X,Z],[Y,Z],[W,Z])=tr(Z([X,[Y,W]]+[Y,[W,X]]+[W,[X,Y]]))=0.(d\omega)_Z([X,Z],[Y,Z],[W,Z])=-\operatorname{tr}\!\left(Z\bigl([X,[Y,W]]+[Y,[W,X]]+[W,[X,Y]]\bigr)\right)=0.

The Jacobi identity gives dω=0d\omega=0, so 𝒪N\mathcal O_N is algebraic symplectic.

The Lie algebra of the subgroup

U={u(A):AMN}U^-=\{u(A):A\in M_N\}

is

{(00A0):AMN},\left\{ \begin{pmatrix}0&0\\-A&0\end{pmatrix}:A\in M_N \right\},

which is abelian. Hence ω\omega vanishes on the tangent spaces of 𝒰N\mathcal U_N. Since dim𝒪N=2N2\dim\mathcal O_N=2N^2,

dim𝒰N=N2=12dim𝒪N,\dim\mathcal U_N=N^2=\tfrac12\dim\mathcal O_N,

so 𝒰N\mathcal U_N is Lagrangian.

For the affine-linear section LXL_X constructed from the circuit, put

L̃X=ιN(LX)𝒞N.\widetilde L_X=\iota_N(L_X)\subset\mathcal C_N.

XL̃X𝒰N=L̃X𝒪N\boxed{X\cong \widetilde L_X\cap\mathcal U_N=\widetilde L_X\cap\mathcal O_N}

The intersection is scheme-theoretic.

The only nonlinear primitive is multiplication. Each product gate is carried by a 2×22\times2 squaring block, while all other circuit wiring is affine-linear. Thus any exact affine-linear presentation of the graph z=xyz=xy can replace this block in the same construction.

an exact affine-linear realization of z=xyz=xy
straight-line circuits
every finitely presented affine scheme

For a finite diagram, adjoin labelled circuit coordinates for every composite. Each morphism is then induced by a coordinate projection, and compositions agree already on the ambient spaces. (See the paper, Cor. 4.5.)

Dual numbers. A representation of k[ε]/(ε2)k[\varepsilon]/(\varepsilon^2) is determined by the square-zero matrix assigned to ε\varepsilon, so

Repq(k[ε]/(ε2))={ZMq:Z2=0}.\operatorname{Rep}_q(k[\varepsilon]/(\varepsilon^2))=\{Z\in M_q:Z^2=0\}.

The two-dimensional dual-number algebra therefore already has universal representation schemes under affine-linear sectioning; dimension one cannot, because its representation schemes are points.

Complexity. The paper also proves that, over \mathbb R, deciding whether a rational affine subspace LM2N()L\subset M_{2N}(\mathbb R) meets 𝒪N()\mathcal O_N(\mathbb R) is \exists\mathbb R-complete, even when L𝒞NL\subset\mathcal C_N and the identity block is fixed. (Thm. 6.1)

Found this interesting and useful?

This article isolates the minimal construction. The companion rank-one paper shows that the same mechanism is lossless far beyond this square-zero orbit. At every prescribed rank r1r\ge1, and in any finite exact presentation language capable of presenting z = xy, the resulting presentation category is equivalent to AffSchRfp\operatorname{AffSch}^{\mathrm{fp}}_R; its Pro-completion recovers AffSchR\operatorname{AffSch}_R, and the set-indexed realization preserves all small affine limits. The construction extends to derived and stacky geometry; over finite fields, it also realizes Set and Stone spaces, material membership, and complete Segal models of small -categories. It also gives optimal size and orbit bounds and real, finite-field, and integral complexity results.

Among the resulting statements

XLX𝒪rssX\cong L_X\cap\mathcal O_{\mathrm{rss}}

Regular-semisimple orbit. 𝒪rss is one split regular-semisimple adjoint orbit with pairwise distinct eigenvalues fixed in advance, over an infinite field with 2 invertible.

(V,)(RkV,rk)(V,\in)\cong(\operatorname{RkV},\in_{\mathrm{rk}})

Material membership. Over a finite field k, RkV consists of isomorphism classes of well-founded, extensional, root-accessible rooted relation codes in the rank-one Set model. Membership is rooted restriction: [G]rk[H]GHa for an immediate predecessor a of the root. Every set is represented by such a code, the codes have trivial automorphism groups, and the isomorphism with (V,) preserves every first-order formula in membership.

Cat𝕎CSS(RkDisck,𝕎)\operatorname{Cat}^{\mathbb W}_\infty\simeq\operatorname{CSS}(\operatorname{RkDisc}_{k,\mathbb W})

-categories. For a finite field k, every 𝕎-small -category has a complete-Segal rank-one realization. Here RkDisck is the filtered-colimit closure of the finite split rank-one objects and is canonically equivalent to Set, with morphisms exactly the functions. Applying this equivalence levelwise gives the displayed equivalence; the universal cocartesian family becomes a rank-one family retaining its fibers, mapping spaces, composition, and higher coherences.